From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mn6Jd-0000K8-66 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:49:37 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mn6JY-0000FM-Fy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:49:36 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40949 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mn6JY-0000F9-Bj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:49:32 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:30959) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mn6JX-00021s-P5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:49:31 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mn6JW-0002hi-Qo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:49:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 13:18:59 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20090914074859.GD13280@amit-x200.redhat.com> References: <1252684353-25067-1-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com> <1252684353-25067-2-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com> <1252684353-25067-3-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com> <4AAA7813.1030904@codemonkey.ws> <20090911163410.GA25535@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4AAA7D0C.2020200@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AAA7D0C.2020200@codemonkey.ws> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/5] virtio-console: Add support for multiple ports for generic guest-host communication List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hey, Just a couple of points here: On (Fri) Sep 11 2009 [11:38:36], Anthony Liguori wrote: > Amit Shah wrote: >> There wasn't any consensus; the discussion just ended abruptly. >> > > At least Gerd and I were in violent agreement. I don't think anyone > disagreed. I think Gerd was ok with the idea of a symlink and Rusty and I kept saying the port number idea isn't as bad. That does count as a disagreement :-) >>> Need to integrate with QemuOpts. >>> >> >> Wondering if it already entered master.. I'll sync up with kraxel if >> not. >> >> > > Yup, it's been there for a while. Just checked; it's in your queue but not in master. Amit