From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MnfFO-0000uy-K5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:07:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MnfFK-0000tT-Nx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:07:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37514 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MnfFK-0000tQ-Jj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:07:30 -0400 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]:12269) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MnfFJ-0004QQ-JW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:07:30 -0400 Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090915210725.DMKM5579.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:07:25 +0100 Received: from miranda.arrow ([213.107.24.213]) by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090915210725.BKHV2093.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@miranda.arrow> for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:07:25 +0100 Received: from sdb by miranda.arrow with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MnfGW-0005bq-K3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:08:44 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:08:44 +0100 From: Stuart Brady Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Solaris SPARC guest on QEMU Message-ID: <20090915210844.GA21465@miranda.arrow> References: <869055.18010.qm@web51404.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:19:41PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote: > > IIRC the CD-ROM drives used by Sun were slightly different from > standard SCSI models, something like the block size could be 512 bytes > instead of 2048 or vice versa. FWIW, PA-RISC machines and some SGI machines also require CD-ROM drives with 512 byte blocks. Cheers, -- Stuart Brady