From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MqXiC-0003Vc-2t
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:41:12 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MqXi6-0003Ua-VV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:41:11 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58016 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MqXi6-0003UU-Qr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:41:06 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13790)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1MqXi6-00062D-DC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:41:06 -0400
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:38:58 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20090923193858.GD18947@redhat.com>
References: <20090923155559.GA18203@redhat.com>
	<4ABA64E4.7070007@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4ABA64E4.7070007@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu: tree for pci related fixes
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>, markmc@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, kraxel@redhat.com, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 01:11:48PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I think it makes sense for everyone to keep their own trees and to make  
> them publicly accessible.  However, for resends, I would still like them  
> to occur on the mailing list.

Okay I guess .. but why?