From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Mqfpr-0006tf-JY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:21:39 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Mqfpn-0006tO-3M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:21:39 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55814 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mqfpm-0006tL-Sn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:21:34 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26015)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1Mqfpm-0007cx-8i
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:21:34 -0400
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:18:56 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20090924041856.GA21782@redhat.com>
References: <20090923155559.GA18203@redhat.com>
	<4ABA64E4.7070007@codemonkey.ws>
	<20090923193858.GD18947@redhat.com>
	<4ABA874D.9040801@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4ABA874D.9040801@codemonkey.ws>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu: tree for pci related fixes
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com>, markmc@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, kraxel@redhat.com, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 03:38:37PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 01:11:48PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>   
>>> I think it makes sense for everyone to keep their own trees and to 
>>> make  them publicly accessible.  However, for resends, I would still 
>>> like them  to occur on the mailing list.
>>>     
>>
>> Okay I guess .. but why?
>>   
> Resends happen for one of two reasons.  Either I'm too slow and the  
> sender is impatient or I've dropped the patch and not provided  
> appropriate explanation.  I see both cases as a failure on my part and  
> [RESEND] on the list gets my attention much better than having a git 
> tree.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori

OK, so the tree will complement RESENDs, not replace them.
Maybe I'll try to script something that converts old patches to RESENDs,
we'll see.

-- 
MST