From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MszGM-000644-HK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:30:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MszGH-0005yw-Q4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:30:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45801 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MszGH-0005yo-Hr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:30:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:17157) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MszGH-0002Zs-2q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:30:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:30:01 -0300 From: Luiz Capitulino Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Release plan for 0.12.0 Message-ID: <20090930103001.21aa7a8d@doriath> In-Reply-To: <4AC29E4D.80707@us.ibm.com> References: <4AC29E4D.80707@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , kvm-devel , Paul Brook On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:54:53 -0500 Anthony Liguori wrote: > I think aiming for early to mid-December would give us roughly a 3 month > cycle and would align well with some of the Linux distribution cycles. > I'd like to limit things to a single -rc that lasted only for about a > week. This is enough time to fix most of the obvious issues I think. How do you plan to do it? I mean, are you going to create a separate branch or make master the -rc? Creating a separate branch (which is what we do today, iiuc) makes it get less attention, freezing master for a certain period is the best way to stabilize. Is this what you had in mind?