From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MszVB-00042S-GK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:45:53 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MszV6-00040M-5M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:45:52 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50219 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MszV5-00040G-MQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:45:47 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60167)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1MszV4-0004zq-97
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:45:47 -0400
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:43:12 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Release plan for 0.12.0
Message-ID: <20090930134312.GA20360@redhat.com>
References: <4AC29E4D.80707@us.ibm.com>
	<20090930022836.GG24813%yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
	<4AC35718.4020102@us.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4AC35718.4020102@us.ibm.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 08:03:20AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi Isaku,
>
> Isaku Yamahata wrote:
>>  o newer chipset (which is based on Q35 chipset)
>>  o multiple pci bus  o PCI express (MMCONFIG)
>>  o PCI express hot plug (not acpi based)
>>  o PCI express switch emulator
>>
>> Although there is no PCIe emulated device at the moment, this will be a 
>> fundamental infrastructure for PCI express native
>> direct attach.
>>   
>
> Your patches definitely deserve review/commit.  I'll make sure that  
> happens for the 0.12 time frame.
>
> Michael, could you help review some of the PCI patches?

Yes, I am doing this sent comments already.
The only thing I have not looked at yet is the new express file.

> Thanks,
>
> -- 
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori