From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mszct-0007bR-AO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:53:51 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mszcn-0007X1-NZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:53:49 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46273 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mszcn-0007Wa-Gs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:53:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57714) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mszcm-0006Fp-Mu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:53:45 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:51:42 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20090930135142.GA20378@redhat.com> References: <20090923200635.GA21246@redhat.com> <20090924191121.GB29419@redhat.com> <20090929161115.GA13885@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: CODING_STYLE (was Re: [PATCHv2] qemu: target library, use it in msix) List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 09:15:04PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wr= ote: > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:13:38PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote: > >> >> As this is not a clean revert anyway, please don't revert the par= t changing > >> >> if (x) > >> >> =A0y; > >> >> else > >> >> =A0z; > >> >> > >> >> to > >> >> > >> >> if (x) { > >> >> =A0y; > >> >> } else { > >> >> =A0z; > >> >> } > >> > > >> > Did I mention I hate this style? But okay :). > >> > >> I'm not a great fan of this either, but this is the CODING_STYLE. > > > > Maybe we can all vote to change this? >=20 > Actually, I tried to tweak 'indent' to match QEMU style without much su= ccess. >=20 > We could also select a new style, like Linux kernel one. I'm also not > a great fan of that either. But at least 'indent' could be used very > easily and I think there would be other benefits, like reuse of Git > hooks, patch checking scripts and Emacs configs. With full 'indent' > support all sources could be massaged mechanically to make the switch > less painful. >=20 > Then there are K&R and GNU styles, but I like them even less. So ... Linux kernel style wins? What do others think? --=20 MST