From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Mt0WS-0005X6-5E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:51:16 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Mt0WN-0005UX-9e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:51:15 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38580 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mt0WN-0005UR-6H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:51:11 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40621)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <amit.shah@redhat.com>) id 1Mt0WM-0007Ov-84
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:51:10 -0400
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:20:09 +0530
From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20090930145009.GA13566@amit-x200.redhat.com>
References: <4AC29E4D.80707@us.ibm.com>
	<20090930051703.GE28188@amit-x200.redhat.com>
	<4AC35751.2090206@us.ibm.com>
	<20090930133715.GA8503@amit-x200.redhat.com>
	<4AC36F7A.7030001@us.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4AC36F7A.7030001@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Release plan for 0.12.0
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>

On (Wed) Sep 30 2009 [09:47:22], Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
>> On (Wed) Sep 30 2009 [08:04:17], Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>   
>>> Amit Shah wrote:
>>>     
>>>> On (Tue) Sep 29 2009 [18:54:53], Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>>     o multiport virtio-console support
>>>>         
>>> Assuming we can get the kernel drivers straightened out, I think it's 
>>>  certainly reasonable for 0.12.
>>
>> The kernel drivers are in fine shape.
>
> I meant on track for including into the appropriate tree.  Looking for  
> an Ack/Nack from Rusty.  That's been the general policy for all virtio  
> changes btw.  Nothing specific to virtio-console.

That's fine.

		Amit