From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MuowQ-0007Mx-DI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:53:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MuowL-0007Kr-Rf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:53:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58863 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MuowL-0007Km-NU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:53:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35772) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MuowL-0001ur-7r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:53:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:51:15 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20091005145115.GA31281@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] what's on qemu tree for pci related fixes List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook , Avi Kivity , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Carsten Otte , Christian Borntraeger , kraxel@redhat.com, markmc@redhat.com, Anthony Liguori , Isaku Yamahata Here's the list of patches on my pci fixes tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/qemu.git pci Here are the pci fixes I know of that haven't been applied already. All, any more comments on any of them? If yes, please reply on the original patch, not here. eee1bff qemu: clean up target page usage in msix 52a5bce fix comment on cpu_register_physical_memory_offset 9305505 qemu/virtio-pci: remove unnecessary check c128c88 qemu/pci: reset device registers on bus reset 74b7e8b qemu/pci: refactor code/symbolic constants 5307502 qemu/virtio: fix reset with device removal c1f2e99 qemu/qdev: type safety in reset handler Isaku Yamahata, would you like me to put some of the fixes you posted onto this tree, to reduce the chance if conflict? I can do this, but you'll have to start including changelog when you repost your patches so I can figure out that some patch was not changed. Anthony, I decided not to rebase the tree, I'll merge master in, instead, on the off chance that you finally get converted to using git pull. But if this makes things inconvenient for you, pls let me know: maybe I can keep both a rebased and non-rebased branches around. Thanks, -- MST