From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Muubo-0003Hx-84 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:56:40 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Muubj-0003Cm-Is for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:56:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39369 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Muubj-0003Cb-Fm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:56:35 -0400 Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.47]:43775) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Muubi-0000Kp-Vv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:56:35 -0400 Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20091005205631.BPIR17029.mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 21:56:31 +0100 Received: from miranda.arrow ([213.107.24.213]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20091005205631.SPCT13254.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@miranda.arrow> for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2009 21:56:31 +0100 Received: from sdb by miranda.arrow with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Muucx-0007b0-08 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:57:51 +0100 Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 21:57:50 +0100 From: Stuart Brady Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] OpenBSD build fixes Message-ID: <20091005205750.GA29185@miranda.arrow> References: <20091005201628.GP25308@overdrive.home.tratt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091005201628.GP25308@overdrive.home.tratt.net> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 09:16:28PM +0100, Laurence Tratt wrote: > It would be good if we could get these patches into the mainline qemu. From > here, there are a couple of more obviously OpenBSD-only patches that aren't > suitable for the main qemu tree, and will need to be maintained seperately. Aren't suitable for the main QEMU tree? Why? Is it somehow a *good* thing for upstream releases not to work OOTB under the BSDs? I really don't understand this... (Or is the name "ports" being taken too literally?) Cheers, -- Stuart Brady