From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mv8BC-0001Mn-3e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:26:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mv8B6-0001KJ-Mz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:26:04 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51306 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mv8B6-0001KF-H3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:26:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60817) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mv8B6-0000XR-2N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 07:26:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:55:18 +0530 From: Amit Shah Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [Qemu-commits] [COMMIT 3031efa] eepro100: Remove unused device status entries Message-ID: <20091006112518.GA29915@amit-x200.redhat.com> References: <200910041304.n94D4EM3012660@d01av01.pok.ibm.com> <4ACA0099.8050407@codemonkey.ws> <20091005143052.GR1274@hall.aurel32.net> <20091006092954.GB25230@amit-x200.redhat.com> <20091006093811.GX5480@hall.aurel32.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091006093811.GX5480@hall.aurel32.net> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Aurelien Jarno Cc: Anthony Liguori , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On (Tue) Oct 06 2009 [11:38:11], Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 02:59:54PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > > On (Mon) Oct 05 2009 [16:30:52], Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 09:20:09AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > > Hi Aurelien, > > > > > > > > Could you revert this commit? This breaks save/restore to older guests > > > > and is misusing the savevm versioning mechanism. > > > > > > > > > > Done. Stefan, please see with Anthony for other eepro100 patches. > > > > Can you also please indicate in the commit log why a particular commit > > is being reverted? > > Given it has already been committed, is it still possible to do that? No; sadly, history cannot be rewritten. Amit