From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MvD67-0005sG-EP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:41:11 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MvD62-0005iO-KF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:41:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53462 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MvD62-0005iD-FZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:41:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35380) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MvD61-0000fI-Sg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:41:06 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:38:45 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] patchwork service. Message-ID: <20091006163845.GA3548@redhat.com> References: <200909142331.49181.jcd@tribudubois.net> <4AAEC8CC.8030602@codemonkey.ws> <4AAEE220.8040706@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AAEE220.8040706@gmx.net> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jean-Christophe Dubois On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 02:38:56AM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > On 15.09.2009 00:50, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > Jean-Christophe Dubois wrote: > >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/ > >> > >> But it is not used as the patch status is not updated for quite a few > >> of them (even if they have been accepted/merged since then). > > > > I looked at the patchwork tooling and it didn't seem to easily > > integrate into my work flow. It seems to be designed with the idea > > that you use their tools to pull and manage patches. I don't think > > those tools will scale to the volume of patches qemu-devel sees > > though. Plus, there's no easy way to deal with the fact that other > > maintainers may not use it. Now there are a few thousand patches and > > trolling through would take ages. > > Note that there are scripts which can be placed in commit hooks and > automatically mark patches as applied if they were not changed between > submission and applying. > There are also scripts which walk the commit history between commit A > and commit B and run the commit hook script for every commit in between. Could you post a link to these scripts please? -- MST