From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MvHlU-0005L5-U0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:40:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MvHlQ-0005KR-AE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:40:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51643 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MvHlQ-0005KL-6O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:40:08 -0400 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]:50369) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MvHlP-0003oY-Ms for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:40:07 -0400 Received: from aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20091006214000.TWJO17277.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 22:40:00 +0100 Received: from miranda.arrow ([213.107.24.213]) by aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20091006214000.XLGV21638.aamtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@miranda.arrow> for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 22:40:00 +0100 Received: from sdb by miranda.arrow with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MvHma-0008BE-CH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:41:20 +0100 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 22:41:20 +0100 From: Stuart Brady Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] CODING_STYLE: {} as in linux kernel Message-ID: <20091006214120.GA31403@miranda.arrow> References: <20091006190115.GA4768@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091006190115.GA4768@redhat.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:01:15PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Most people seem to hate using {} around sngle-statement blocks. > And code isn't consistent either way. So let's change our standard > to something most people like, and eliminate the pain source. I can't see how this is really an improvement. All it means is that patches have to deal with adding extra '{'s and '}'s, which is a pointless distraction when reading patches... Regards, -- Stuart Brady