From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mw7pF-0006ls-7L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:15:33 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mw7pD-0006lX-W3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:15:32 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50502 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mw7pD-0006lU-QB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:15:31 -0400 Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:44041 helo=grelber.thyrsus.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mw7pD-00074a-HF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:15:31 -0400 Received: from landley.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grelber.thyrsus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C863F9F01CA for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 01:22:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Rob Landley Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] How do I disable -curses mode? Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 00:15:27 -0500 References: <200910080303.26027.rob@landley.net> In-Reply-To: <200910080303.26027.rob@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200910090015.27696.rob@landley.net> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thursday 08 October 2009 03:03:25 Rob Landley wrote: > I'm running qemu -nographic from a script, booting up a linux -kernel with > a serial console and driving it via "expect" to feed data to its stdin and > parse its output. > > This worked fine under 0.10.0, but under 0.11.0 it craps curses escape > sequences all over the place, ala: Nevermind, the curses issue got fixed during the development series. The escape sequences I was still seeing were busybox ash trying to query the TTY size at the other end of the serial console. (That I can work around easily enough, and are deterministically placed anyway.) My bad, carry on. :) Rob -- Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds