From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MwDnJ-0002sR-S8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:37:57 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MwDnF-0002nc-RU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:37:57 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35230 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MwDnF-0002nK-4n
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:37:53 -0400
Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:37943)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <jamie@shareable.org>) id 1MwDnE-000522-Jv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:37:52 -0400
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 12:37:38 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] qemu: make cirrus init value pci
	spec compliant
Message-ID: <20091009113738.GH6576@shareable.org>
References: <cover.1255013225.git.mst@redhat.com>
	<20091008145241.GC12275@redhat.com> <4ACE0559.5040206@redhat.com>
	<20091008160623.GA13710@redhat.com> <4ACE0FC6.3050908@redhat.com>
	<20091008184011.GA6576@shareable.org>
	<20091009064359.GA9942@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20091009064359.GA9942@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> More long-term, we have duplication between reset and init
> routines. Maybe devices really should have init and cleanup,
> and on reset we'd cleanup all devices and then init them again?

It sounds look a good idea to me.  That is, after all, what hardware
reset often does :-)

-- Jamie