From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MwE3a-0008Vy-LH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:54:46 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MwE3V-0008RJ-4w
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:54:45 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37295 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MwE3U-0008Qw-V4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:54:40 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12760)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1MwE3U-0007aw-FE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2009 07:54:40 -0400
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 13:54:36 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] qemu: make cirrus init value pci
	spec compliant
Message-ID: <20091009115436.GJ19692@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1255013225.git.mst@redhat.com>
	<20091008145241.GC12275@redhat.com> <4ACE0559.5040206@redhat.com>
	<20091008160623.GA13710@redhat.com> <4ACE0FC6.3050908@redhat.com>
	<20091008184011.GA6576@shareable.org>
	<20091009064359.GA9942@redhat.com>
	<20091009113738.GH6576@shareable.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20091009113738.GH6576@shareable.org>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>

On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 12:37:38PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > More long-term, we have duplication between reset and init
> > routines. Maybe devices really should have init and cleanup,
> > and on reset we'd cleanup all devices and then init them again?
> 
> It sounds look a good idea to me.  That is, after all, what hardware
> reset often does :-)
> 
That is a two stage reset that was discussed already and deemed to be
the way to go.

--
			Gleb.