From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1My9i6-0001Mo-SC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:40:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1My9i2-0001MI-9o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:40:34 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40376 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1My9i2-0001MF-65 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:40:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5494) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1My9i1-0005SR-OQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:40:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:37:55 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH-updated] qemu/net: add raw backend Message-ID: <20091014193754.GA31209@redhat.com> References: <20091014143415.GA29937@redhat.com> <4AD5E449.9070301@codemonkey.ws> <20091014151406.GA17062@shareable.org> <4AD5F51E.7040907@codemonkey.ws> <20091014161424.GA30308@redhat.com> <4AD61A31.1080109@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AD61A31.1080109@codemonkey.ws> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Or Gerlitz , Arnd Bergmann , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:36:33PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > We're talking about > adding something that's supposed to be "easier" but I'm arguing that > it's not easier unless you're a kernel hacker I guess it's hard for a kernel hacker to argue :) > and deeply understand the > limitations of the implementation. If we address host to guest, it'd become worthwhile then? -- MST