From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N0yIk-000624-CO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:06:02 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N0yIf-000600-CJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:06:01 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42934 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N0yIe-0005zt-W0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:05:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33635) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N0yIe-0003Lw-DV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:05:56 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:35:13 +0530 From: Amit Shah Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/11] Add support for qfloat Message-ID: <20091022140513.GC21010@amit-x200.redhat.com> References: <1255786571-3528-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <1255786571-3528-3-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <20091018202134.639c1d00@doriath> <4ADC752B.90603@us.ibm.com> <20091022084900.GB15128@amit-x200.redhat.com> <4AE065CC.5010208@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AE065CC.5010208@us.ibm.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino On (Thu) Oct 22 2009 [09:01:48], Anthony Liguori wrote: > Amit Shah wrote: >> On (Mon) Oct 19 2009 [09:18:19], Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >>>>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See >>>>> + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory. >>>>> + * >>>>> + * Copyright IBM, Corp. 2009 >>>>> + * >>>>> + * Authors: >>>>> + * Anthony Liguori >>>>> + * >>>>> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.1 or later. >>>>> + * See the COPYING.LIB file in the top-level directory. >>>>> + * >>>>> + */ >>>>> >>>> I see you're double licensing it to respect my initial choice, but you >>>> can leave only LGPL for this new code. >>>> >>>> I will send patches changing the ones written by me. >>>> >>> Great, I'm hoping we can make the whole thing LGPL 2.1+ so that we >>> can allow libraries like libvirt to use it. >>> >> >> Why 'or later'? Let's just stick to a version that we know and accept. >> If you end up later liking version 3, you can change the text then. >> > > It really doesn't matter in the context of LGPL so I don't mind if we do > 2.1 only. Yeah; better a known evil than an unknown one :-) Amit