From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N10gc-0008El-Vb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:38:51 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N10gY-00088c-Fx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:38:50 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45481 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N10gX-000882-NS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:38:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39280) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N10gW-0002D4-Ud for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:38:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:38:33 -0200 From: Luiz Capitulino Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] new SDL keyboard shortcuts to start and stop VM Message-ID: <20091022143833.51c48260@doriath> In-Reply-To: <4AE07D06.4080205@codemonkey.ws> References: <4ADCE635.4060604@codemonkey.ws> <4ADD9388.8040206@redhat.com> <20091020170800.GG32538@redhat.com> <4ADEB7EF.3060800@redhat.com> <5d6222a80910210652q3b005ca6ub950a2014bfbaa41@mail.gmail.com> <5d6222a80910210924j62505b7dtf298754ce65f1c99@mail.gmail.com> <20091021183503.GA27677@shareable.org> <20091022124036.5df991f3@doriath> <4AE07D06.4080205@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Kevin Wolf , Glauber Costa , Mulyadi Santosa , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:40:54 -0500 Anthony Liguori wrote: > Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > Yeah, I agree. > > > > When testing migration, for example, I have to type 'migrate -d tcp:0:4444' > > several times... Maybe there's a smarter way to do this, but the monitor > > macros idea seems interesting to me. > > > > When we have QMP, we can create a QMP socket at a well known location > based on the -name parameter. We could also introduce a qm command that > allowed one to execute monitor commands from the shell. That allows > people to write whatever crazy shell scripts they want. Yes. What about the macros idea? Are you against it?