From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N1N5H-0004jW-FJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:33:47 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N1N5C-0004aL-4H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:33:46 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46838 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N1N5B-0004a5-Un for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:33:41 -0400 Received: from irq.hestdesign.com ([212.97.207.97]:45288) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N1N5B-00033H-Ky for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:33:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 18:33:40 +0200 From: Andreas Plesner Jacobsen Message-ID: <20091023163339.GN2455@nerd.dk> References: <4AE1D903.5030709@msgid.tls.msk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AE1D903.5030709@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: net packet storms with multiple NICs List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Tokarev Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , KVM list On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 08:25:39PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > > o why different -net guest -net host pairs are not getting different > vlan= indexes by default, to stop the above-mentioned packet > storms right away? I think it's a wise default to assign different > pairs to different vlans, by counting -net host and -net guest > sequences. I think the major issue is that the definition of a "pair" is when the vlan-options match. There's no requirement to define the two after each other. -- Andreas