* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/25] i386: add private features for a20mask
@ 2009-10-28 16:32 TAKEDA, toshiya
2009-10-28 20:26 ` Stuart Brady
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: TAKEDA, toshiya @ 2009-10-28 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
This patch is to add private_features to i386.
It is like cpuid_ext*_features, but is used for any features not defined in CPUID.
And "a20mask" feature is defined in private_features.
It is for a20 adrdress mask of PC-98 family.
--- a/qemu/target-i386/cpu.h
+++ b/qemu/target-i386/cpu.h
@@ -405,6 +405,8 @@
#define CPUID_EXT3_IBS (1 << 10)
#define CPUID_EXT3_SKINIT (1 << 12)
+#define PRIVATE_FEATURE_A20MASK (1 << 0)
+
#define CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_1 0x756e6547 /* "Genu" */
#define CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_2 0x49656e69 /* "ineI" */
#define CPUID_VENDOR_INTEL_3 0x6c65746e /* "ntel" */
@@ -685,6 +687,9 @@ typedef struct CPUX86State {
uint32_t cpuid_apic_id;
int cpuid_vendor_override;
+ /* private features not defined in CPUID */
+ uint32_t private_features;
+
/* MTRRs */
uint64_t mtrr_fixed[11];
uint64_t mtrr_deftype;
diff --git a/qemu/target-i386/helper.c b/qemu/target-i386/helper.c
index c961544..3580740 100644
--- a/qemu/target-i386/helper.c
+++ b/qemu/target-i386/helper.c
@@ -57,11 +57,18 @@ static const char *ext3_feature_name[] = {
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
};
+static const char *private_feature_name[] = {
+ "a20mask", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+};
static void add_flagname_to_bitmaps(const char *flagname, uint32_t *features,
uint32_t *ext_features,
uint32_t *ext2_features,
- uint32_t *ext3_features)
+ uint32_t *ext3_features,
+ uint32_t *private_features)
{
int i;
int found = 0;
@@ -86,6 +93,11 @@ static void add_flagname_to_bitmaps(const char *flagname, uint32_t *features,
*ext3_features |= 1 << i;
found = 1;
}
+ for ( i = 0 ; i < 32 ; i++ )
+ if (private_feature_name[i] && !strcmp (flagname, private_feature_name[i])) {
+ *private_features |= 1 << i;
+ found = 1;
+ }
if (!found) {
fprintf(stderr, "CPU feature %s not found\n", flagname);
}
@@ -99,6 +111,7 @@ typedef struct x86_def_t {
int model;
int stepping;
uint32_t features, ext_features, ext2_features, ext3_features;
+ uint32_t private_features;
uint32_t xlevel;
char model_id[48];
int vendor_override;
@@ -375,6 +388,7 @@ static int cpu_x86_find_by_name(x86_def_t *x86_cpu_def, const char *cpu_model)
char *featurestr, *name = strtok(s, ",");
uint32_t plus_features = 0, plus_ext_features = 0, plus_ext2_features = 0, plus_ext3_features = 0;
uint32_t minus_features = 0, minus_ext_features = 0, minus_ext2_features = 0, minus_ext3_features = 0;
+ uint32_t plus_private_features = 0, minus_private_features = 0;
uint32_t numvalue;
def = NULL;
@@ -393,16 +407,21 @@ static int cpu_x86_find_by_name(x86_def_t *x86_cpu_def, const char *cpu_model)
}
add_flagname_to_bitmaps("hypervisor", &plus_features,
- &plus_ext_features, &plus_ext2_features, &plus_ext3_features);
+ &plus_ext_features, &plus_ext2_features, &plus_ext3_features,
+ &plus_private_features);
featurestr = strtok(NULL, ",");
while (featurestr) {
char *val;
if (featurestr[0] == '+') {
- add_flagname_to_bitmaps(featurestr + 1, &plus_features, &plus_ext_features, &plus_ext2_features, &plus_ext3_features);
+ add_flagname_to_bitmaps(featurestr + 1, &plus_features,
+ &plus_ext_features, &plus_ext2_features, &plus_ext3_features,
+ &plus_private_features);
} else if (featurestr[0] == '-') {
- add_flagname_to_bitmaps(featurestr + 1, &minus_features, &minus_ext_features, &minus_ext2_features, &minus_ext3_features);
+ add_flagname_to_bitmaps(featurestr + 1, &minus_features,
+ &minus_ext_features, &minus_ext2_features, &minus_ext3_features,
+ &minus_private_features);
} else if ((val = strchr(featurestr, '='))) {
*val = 0; val++;
if (!strcmp(featurestr, "family")) {
@@ -479,10 +498,12 @@ static int cpu_x86_find_by_name(x86_def_t *x86_cpu_def, const char *cpu_model)
x86_cpu_def->ext_features |= plus_ext_features;
x86_cpu_def->ext2_features |= plus_ext2_features;
x86_cpu_def->ext3_features |= plus_ext3_features;
+ x86_cpu_def->private_features |= plus_private_features;
x86_cpu_def->features &= ~minus_features;
x86_cpu_def->ext_features &= ~minus_ext_features;
x86_cpu_def->ext2_features &= ~minus_ext2_features;
x86_cpu_def->ext3_features &= ~minus_ext3_features;
+ x86_cpu_def->private_features &= ~minus_private_features;
free(s);
return 0;
@@ -528,6 +549,7 @@ static int cpu_x86_register (CPUX86State *env, const char *cpu_model)
env->cpuid_ext2_features = def->ext2_features;
env->cpuid_xlevel = def->xlevel;
env->cpuid_ext3_features = def->ext3_features;
+ env->private_features = def->private_features;
{
const char *model_id = def->model_id;
int c, len, i;
@@ -569,7 +591,11 @@ void cpu_reset(CPUX86State *env)
env->hflags2 |= HF2_GIF_MASK;
cpu_x86_update_cr0(env, 0x60000010);
- env->a20_mask = ~0x0;
+ if (env->private_features & PRIVATE_FEATURE_A20MASK) {
+ env->a20_mask = 0xfffff;
+ } else {
+ env->a20_mask = ~0x0;
+ }
env->smbase = 0x30000;
env->idt.limit = 0xffff;
@@ -938,7 +964,15 @@ void cpu_x86_set_a20(CPUX86State *env, int a20_state)
/* when a20 is changed, all the MMU mappings are invalid, so
we must flush everything */
tlb_flush(env, 1);
- env->a20_mask = ~(1 << 20) | (a20_state << 20);
+ if (env->private_features & PRIVATE_FEATURE_A20MASK) {
+ if (a20_state) {
+ env->a20_mask = ~0x0;
+ } else {
+ env->a20_mask = 0xfffff;
+ }
+ } else {
+ env->a20_mask = ~(1 << 20) | (a20_state << 20);
+ }
}
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/25] i386: add private features for a20mask
2009-10-28 16:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/25] i386: add private features for a20mask TAKEDA, toshiya
@ 2009-10-28 20:26 ` Stuart Brady
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stuart Brady @ 2009-10-28 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:32:51AM +0900, TAKEDA, toshiya wrote:
> This patch is to add private_features to i386.
> It is like cpuid_ext*_features, but is used for any features not defined in CPUID.
>
> And "a20mask" feature is defined in private_features.
> It is for a20 adrdress mask of PC-98 family.
I'd suggest giving it a name like "pc98_a20mask" to make it clear that it's a
PC-98 specific feature.
TBH, I wonder whether this really belongs as a CPU feature, as it's not
really something I would have thought should be exposed to the user...
although perhaps the same could be said about CPUID bits generally...
Presumably PC-98 provides the same A20 mask behaviour even when using a
486 or better (which IIUC have built-in A20 gate logic)?
BTW, your patches need a 'signed-off-by' line, which is your statement
that they follow the rules in the 'developer's certificate of origin':
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/SubmittingPatches
Cheers,
--
Stuart Brady
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-28 20:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-28 16:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/25] i386: add private features for a20mask TAKEDA, toshiya
2009-10-28 20:26 ` Stuart Brady
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).