From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N3WRT-000698-Qp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:57:35 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N3WRP-00066g-6I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:57:35 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41675 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N3WRO-00066V-Th
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:57:31 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:46900)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1N3WRN-00025t-Uf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:57:30 -0400
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:57:15 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] megaraid_sas HBA emulation
Message-ID: <20091029145715.GA3299@lst.de>
References: <4AE71116.6080809@suse.de> <4AE72419.60608@redhat.com>
	<20091028091129.n46xqd1lww8oosc8@imap.suse.de>
	<4AE822E7.2010108@redhat.com> <4AE84E09.7090002@redhat.com>
	<20091028202522.r53660olwsk8cokk@imap.suse.de>
	<20091029043708.GA3552@lst.de> <4AE99144.6050904@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4AE99144.6050904@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:57:40PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Trying to go forward in review+bisect friendly baby steps.  Here is what 
> I have now:
> 
> http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/kraxel.git?a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/scsi.v1
> 
> It is far from being completed, will continue tomorrow.  Should give a 
> idea of the direction I'm heading to though.  Comments welcome.

Nice.

I had patches for the header renames, too - the current naming is
really awkward.  Would be great if Anthony could take those ASAP.

Btw, I also splitted out a cdrom.h from the new scsi.h, not sure if it's
worth it for the two prototypes.

Just wondering, shouldn't scsi-bus.c just become scsi.c now that it's
growing various non-bus glue bits?