From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N5Ncb-0001BC-Uf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:56:45 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N5NcX-00018b-HV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:56:45 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49048 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N5NcX-00018F-Db
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:56:41 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29312)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <amit.shah@redhat.com>) id 1N5NcW-0002CU-UB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:56:41 -0500
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:25:52 +0530
From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20091103175552.GA25029@amit-x200.redhat.com>
References: <1257258596-4556-1-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com>
	<1257258596-4556-2-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com>
	<1257258596-4556-3-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com>
	<4AF063A9.7000908@siemens.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4AF063A9.7000908@siemens.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] char: Remove special init_reset
	handling
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On (Tue) Nov 03 2009 [18:08:57], Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > The initial_reset sent to chardevs doesn't do much other than setting
> > a bool to true. Char devices are interested in the open event and
> > that gets sent whenever the device is opened.
> 
> Have you checked with the monitor in all use cases (dedicated & muxed
> console, stdio & SDL console, etc.)? It was introduced once to fix a

I've checked with -monitor stdio, monitor in SDL and also chardevs using
unix sockets.

I've not tried mux yet; I'll try that and report back. BTW if it ends up
not working with this patch, it'd be broken in the current master as
well.

> corner case, I think it's even documented...

Hm; I'll have to look really deep; haven't found any such thing yet.

		Amit