From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N5mw4-00053N-79 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:58:32 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N5mvz-0004zY-HV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:58:31 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42789 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N5mvz-0004zQ-Ee for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:58:27 -0500 Received: from nan.false.org ([208.75.86.248]:60013) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N5mvz-00067J-2t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:58:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:58:25 -0500 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix a parallel build failure. Message-ID: <20091104205825.GA11267@caradoc.them.org> References: <1257366009-7057-1-git-send-email-drow@false.org> <4AF1E896.4060606@mail.berlios.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AF1E896.4060606@mail.berlios.de> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 09:48:22PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote: > Maybe a mix of your patch and my patch > (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/37446/) > would be the best fix for this problem. > > It should also be possible to apply both patches. Thanks, I didn't find your patch. I don't have any preference which is applied, although I'm always in favor of eliminating unnecessary recursive invocations. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery