From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N648K-00005v-DM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:20:20 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N648F-0008Rp-58 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:20:19 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59145 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N648E-0008Ri-V6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:20:15 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43985) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N648E-0005vU-HK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:20:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:20:05 +0000 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] net-bridge: rootless bridge support for qemu Message-ID: <20091105152005.GI689@redhat.com> References: <1257294485-27015-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <4AF2E247.3090409@redhat.com> <4AF2E7CE.8010506@us.ibm.com> <20091105151154.GF689@redhat.com> <4AF2EBBB.7070605@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AF2EBBB.7070605@redhat.com> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Mark McLoughlin , Anthony Liguori , Arnd Bergmann , Juan Quintela , Dustin Kirkland , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Michael Tsirkin On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 05:14:03PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 11/05/2009 05:11 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >The main problem is that we've never really used the 'session' instances, > >since networking configs are rather limited to pretty much just SLIRP > >and people expect full bridging. I think this patch series you've > >done is invaluable and will let us finally make full use of the libvirt > >'session' instances for desktop virt, running everything unprivileged. > > > > > > What's to stop you from using the same idea to get a tap fd for the > unprivileged libvirtd instance? Nothing in particular, but we've not done so thus far Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|