From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N65LM-00046E-MY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:37:52 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1N65LH-0003yg-Iw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:37:52 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40166 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N65LH-0003yR-BR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:37:47 -0500
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:52905)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <dan@codesourcery.com>)
	id 1N65LH-0001Zq-3a
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:37:47 -0500
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([38.113.113.100])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <dan@codesourcery.com>) id 1N65LF-0003hW-T7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:37:46 -0500
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:37:41 -0500
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
Message-ID: <20091105163741.GA3983@caradoc.them.org>
References: <cover.1257428255.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<20091105141335.GY3983@caradoc.them.org>
	<m38welc5ed.fsf@neno.mitica>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m38welc5ed.fsf@neno.mitica>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/2] Build fixes
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 05:17:46PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> How are you compiling?
> It works for me compiling in-tree with make -j3 (only 2 cores)

I can reliably reproduce it by building all my QEMU configs at once.
I think that's a four-core or eight-core machine, -j4 in each build,
six separate qemu build trees.  I've reproduced it in a single build
tree a couple of times, but not reliably.

> > Also, your changes to $(QEMU_PROG) and recurse-all are not necessary;
> 
> before recurse-all is necesary, because the sub-targets use
> config-host.h (they don't use config-all-devices.h, but it don't hurt to
> also generate it).

Oh, you're right.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery