From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7ZUt-00071u-CY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:01:51 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N7ZUo-0006yV-3M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:01:51 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56198 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N7ZUn-0006yP-NF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:01:45 -0500 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:52444) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7ZUn-0007SP-3n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:01:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:01:44 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] virtio: Report new guest memory statistics pertinent to memory ballooning (V2) Message-ID: <20091109190144.GB3808@shareable.org> References: <1257782838.2835.5.camel@aglitke> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1257782838.2835.5.camel@aglitke> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Adam Litke Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity Adam Litke wrote: > +static inline void print_stat(Monitor *mon, uint32_t val, const char *label) > +{ > + if (val != -1) { > + monitor_printf(mon, ",%s=%u", label, val); > + } > +} > + > static void do_info_balloon(Monitor *mon) > { > - ram_addr_t actual; > + QEMUBalloonState s; > + int ret; > > - actual = qemu_balloon_status(); > - if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_has_sync_mmu()) > + ret = qemu_balloon_status(&s); > + if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_has_sync_mmu()) { > monitor_printf(mon, "Using KVM without synchronous MMU, " > "ballooning disabled\n"); > - else if (actual == 0) > + } else if (ret < 0) { > monitor_printf(mon, "Ballooning not activated in VM\n"); > - else > - monitor_printf(mon, "balloon: actual=%d\n", (int)(actual >> 20)); > + } else { > + monitor_printf(mon, "balloon: actual=%d", (int)(s.actual >> 20)); > + print_stat(mon, s.stats.pswapin, "pages_swapped_in"); > + print_stat(mon, s.stats.pswapout, "pages_swapped_out"); > + print_stat(mon, s.stats.panon, "anon_pages"); > + print_stat(mon, s.stats.pgmajfault, "major_page_faults"); > + print_stat(mon, s.stats.pgminfault, "minor_page_faults"); > + print_stat(mon, s.stats.memfree, "free_memory"); > + print_stat(mon, s.stats.memtot, "total_memory"); > + monitor_printf(mon, "\n"); > + } > + > } These days, would it make more sense to emit a QJSON object? In this case the JSON object is quite human readable too. -- Jamie