From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N89gg-0002gt-EF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:40:26 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N89gb-0002e3-Df for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:40:25 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37474 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N89ga-0002dh-DX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:40:20 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36460) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N89gZ-0004sI-Tl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:40:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:37:37 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20091111093737.GA3276@redhat.com> References: <20091026131715.GA25271@redhat.com> <200911110134.13064.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200911110134.13064.paul@codesourcery.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] qemu/virtio: make wmb compiler barrier + comments List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 01:34:12AM +0000, Paul Brook wrote: > On Monday 26 October 2009, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > wmb must be at least a compiler barrier, even without SMP. > > Why? Because virtio code might run on a separate thread from guest. If compiler reorders writes, guest might see inconsistent data. -- MST