From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NA9Ok-0006yG-1S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:46:10 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NA9Of-0006pY-6O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:46:09 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45497 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NA9Oe-0006pA-S0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:46:04 -0500 Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:46811) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NA9Oe-0004ya-Dn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:46:04 -0500 Received: from d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (d01relay06.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.116]) by e8.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nAGHfxbu029199 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:41:59 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nAGLk07m1273898 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:46:01 -0500 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id nAGHdiAn013002 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:39:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:45:54 -0600 From: Ryan Harper Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [sneak preview] major scsi overhaul Message-ID: <20091116214554.GE10280@us.ibm.com> References: <4AF4ACA5.2090701@redhat.com> <200911111413.09320.paul@codesourcery.com> <4AFAD7A8.70707@redhat.com> <200911111638.31288.paul@codesourcery.com> <4B017F46.4030700@redhat.com> <20091116190823.GR11154@us.ibm.com> <4B01B8CA.5020205@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B01B8CA.5020205@redhat.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Ryan Harper , Paul Brook , qemu-devel@nongnu.org * Gerd Hoffmann [2009-11-16 14:42]: > Hi, > > >>Suggestions for other guests which might be sensitive to changes like > >>this? Maybe even some which don't work with the current lsi emulation? > > > >XP 64-bit, 2k3 32/64, 2k8 32/64 > > > >64-bit is important because the DMA mode of the lsi driver is different > >when the 64-bit versions of the win drivers. > > Are these in the "needs regression testing" or in the "known broken" group? Regression: xp-64 2k3-32/64 Known Broken: 2k8-32/64 -- Ryan Harper Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center IBM Corp., Austin, Tx ryanh@us.ibm.com