From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NAAdH-0007Ev-R4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:05:15 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NAAdD-0007CK-09 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:05:15 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44815 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NAAdC-0007CF-R5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:05:10 -0500 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:57301) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NAAdB-0007wo-Pc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:05:10 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:05:07 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Don't leak file descriptors Message-ID: <20091116230507.GG12063@shareable.org> References: <1258125436-23759-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <4B0149C8.7040203@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Blue Swirl wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 13.11.2009 22:05, schrieb Blue Swirl: > >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > >>> We're leaking file descriptors to child processes. Set FD_CLOEXEC on file > >>> descriptors that don't need to be passed to children to stop this misbehaviour. > >> > >>> -        c = accept(s, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, &addrlen); > >>> +        c = qemu_accept(s, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, &addrlen); > >> > >> Would it be possible to improve the interface so that no casts are > >> needed for the calling code? > > > > How exactly would you do that? The only way I see to do it would be > > using void*, but I'm not sure if this really is an improvement. > > Instead of sockaddr_in vs. sockaddr and the lame casts in between, we > could have QSockAddr which magically works. Or if we only ever use > sockaddr_in, just use that. int qemu_accept(int s, union __attribute__((__transparent_union__)) { struct sockaddr *sa; struct sockaddr_in *sin; struct sockaddr_in6 *sin6; } addr, socklen_t len); #define qemu_accept(s, addr) qemu_accept(s, addr, sizeof(*addr)) Seems to work. :-) Or use a typedef to prettify, but there's no need for another named type in the API. (But you might create QSockAddr anyway, for things like printing and parsing). Enjoy, -- Jamie