From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NATXj-0006vO-Ru for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:16:47 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NATXi-0006td-0k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:16:47 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46734 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NATXh-0006ta-Sm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:16:45 -0500 Received: from mx34.mail.ru ([94.100.176.48]:61251) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NATXh-0004im-GO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:16:45 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:17:56 +0300 From: Evgeniy Dushistov Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] add emulation of atmel pflash memory Message-ID: <20091117191756.GA13844@rain> References: <20091115204705.GA25577@rain> <5b31733c0911170128t13c633c3gf621b10f791e144f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5b31733c0911170128t13c633c3gf621b10f791e144f@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Filip Navara Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:28:25AM +0100, Filip Navara wrote: > Interesting, I have been working on AT91SAM7X implementation. Most of > the stuff is in the GIT repository at > http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/navara.git > > Any way to merge the efforts? I'd love to merge both mine and your > patches to the mainline (minus the overlapping parts of the system > controller). In fact my patches lack the flash emulation which would > be a welcome addition. > I made quick look at >http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/navara.git Looks good. I'm going to see, what parts of your code can be reused in at91sam9263 implementation, and then republish patches, or we can then merge them into your repository. About flash, why do you not used existing implementation of intel and amd nor flashes (pflash_cfi0[12].c)? I implemented atmel nor flash, because of it used on my real board with at91sam9263 cpu. And another question, why your support of at91sam7x still not merged into mainline? -- /Evgeniy