From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NAwtI-00041S-4C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:37:00 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NAwtC-000400-G6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:36:58 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37697 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NAwtC-0003zx-Dm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:36:54 -0500 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:60072) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NAwtC-00046w-3f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:36:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:36:51 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10]: QError v4 Message-ID: <20091119023651.GA15128@shareable.org> References: <1258487037-24950-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <4B04383A.9050101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B04383A.9050101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino , Markus Armbruster , kraxel@redhat.com Anthony Liguori wrote: > Markus Armbruster wrote: > >3. It falls short of the requirement that clients can easily present a > > human-readable error description to their human users, regardless of > > whether they know the error or not. > > > > That's just incorrect. We provide an example conversion table that's > akin to strerror() or a __repr__ for an exception in Python. Markus refers to errors that the client does not know - i.e. when the client is older than qemu, or is not in the same development branch if it's a branched qemu. Which means the client won't have a fully up to date conversion table. Do you mean qemu provides it's current conversion table to the client over the wire protocol? -- Jamie