From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NBNrH-0003ku-2n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:24:43 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NBNrC-0003g0-6i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:24:42 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40269 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NBNrB-0003fn-W0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:24:38 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49218) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NBNrB-0008TQ-Hy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:24:37 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:53:46 +0530 From: Amit Shah Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/10] qdev: Use QError for 'device not found' error Message-ID: <20091120072346.GA4112@amit-x200.redhat.com> References: <1258487037-24950-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> <1258487037-24950-10-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, kraxel@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino On (Wed) Nov 18 2009 [16:17:02], Markus Armbruster wrote: > Luiz Capitulino writes: > > > @@ -176,8 +177,7 @@ DeviceState *qdev_device_add(QemuOpts *opts) > > /* find driver */ > > info = qdev_find_info(NULL, driver); > > if (!info) { > > - qemu_error("Device \"%s\" not found. Try -device '?' for a list.\n", > > - driver); > > + qemu_error_new(QERR_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND, driver); > > return NULL; > > } > > if (info->no_user) { > > Not obvious from this patch, but we lose the "Try -device '?' for a > list" hint here. In PATCH 7/10: BTW that hint isn't always appropriate as it's printed on the monitor when doing 'device_add' as well. Amit