From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCEyE-0006Yx-4f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:07:26 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCEy9-0006Xd-0f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:07:25 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57771 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCEy8-0006XZ-Uz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:07:20 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13341) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NCEy8-0005Ip-CA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:07:20 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:04:34 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20091122160434.GD26896@redhat.com> References: <20091122151945.GA25903@redhat.com> <4B095B84.3020104@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B095B84.3020104@codemonkey.ws> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: what's on qemu tree for pci related fixes List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Carsten Otte , markmc@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christian Borntraeger , Isaku Yamahata , kraxel@redhat.com, Avi Kivity , Paul Brook On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:40:52AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> Here's the list of patches on my pci fixes tree: >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/qemu.git pci >> >> Here are the pci fixes I know of that haven't been applied already. >> They mostly fix up minor nits. All, any more comments on any of them? >> If yes, please reply on the original patch, not here. >> > > Most of these are in staging minus Isaku's latest series. The last > series caused some gnarly regressions You mean the regressions caused by series that were already applied? This series is actually about fixing up nits from that last one :) > so I've got them in a separate > branch for more thorough testing. It isn't a public branch, is it? > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori -- MST