From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: POST failure (loop) with isapc and seabios
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:42:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091125164205.GP2999@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091125153116.GA30957@morn.localdomain>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:31:16AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 02:20:39PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 06:09:51AM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > > But the BIOS must be reloaded from ROM, I'm guessing, if the keyboard
> > > controller method is used and the word asking for a branch back to the
> > > application has not been set. Because that's how a modern OS (if not
> > > using ACPI) asks for a system reset.
> > >
> > > Do you think the above is (a) correct, and (b) what's implemented?
> > >
> > Do different things during reset depending on CMOS values doesn't sound
> > right to me. I don't know what is implemented right now. I thought that
> > we reload BIOS on reset.
>
> We could have qemu do a soft reset (not reload rom) on a triple fault
> or keyboard controller reset, and then have SeaBIOS request a hard
> reset (have qemu reload rom) if it detects a soft reset that is not a
> "resume" request.
>
> I'm also not sure what qemu does today.
>
There is not notion of "soft" reset or "hard" reset in QEMU today. On
real modern HW the things are even more complex. There are power planes
that can be powered off independently. Think about computer in S3 sleep
state. Almost everything is powered of ("hard" reset) except of the memory
and RTC.
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-25 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-19 21:30 [Qemu-devel] POST failure (loop) with isapc and seabios Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-20 22:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin O'Connor
2009-11-21 14:37 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-22 12:35 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-22 15:07 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-22 15:10 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-22 15:31 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-22 15:38 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-22 17:40 ` Kevin O'Connor
2009-11-22 21:15 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-22 22:04 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-23 11:14 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-23 11:17 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-22 20:01 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-23 11:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-23 19:19 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-23 19:43 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-23 21:30 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-24 6:28 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-24 14:38 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-24 14:40 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-25 6:09 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-25 12:20 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-25 15:31 ` Kevin O'Connor
2009-11-25 16:42 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2009-11-25 22:11 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-27 3:00 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-27 19:13 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-25 22:04 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-25 22:53 ` Kevin O'Connor
2009-11-26 6:49 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-26 7:15 ` Kevin O'Connor
2009-11-26 7:20 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-26 7:48 ` Kevin O'Connor
2009-11-26 7:56 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-26 8:12 ` Kevin O'Connor
2009-11-26 8:19 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-26 16:03 ` Kevin O'Connor
2009-11-26 22:35 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-27 5:39 ` Kevin O'Connor
2009-11-26 6:45 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-26 20:55 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-27 7:44 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-27 20:42 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-29 8:20 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-29 22:53 ` Natalia Portillo
2009-11-30 7:12 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-30 20:53 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-11-30 21:02 ` Natalia Portillo
2009-12-01 2:16 ` Kevin O'Connor
2009-11-30 20:34 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-12-01 9:37 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-25 21:08 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-24 23:27 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-25 10:48 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-22 15:38 ` Kevin O'Connor
2009-11-23 11:16 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-23 17:57 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-23 18:07 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-11-23 19:12 ` Sebastian Herbszt
2009-11-23 19:18 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091125164205.GP2999@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=herbszt@gmx.de \
--cc=kevin@koconnor.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).