From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NFSEd-00061I-6N
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:53:39 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NFSEY-00060K-MR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:53:38 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35037 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFSEY-00060F-97
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:53:34 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:61140)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1NFSEX-0004yj-Ow
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:53:34 -0500
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:53:23 -0200
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 00/20] QEMU Monitor Protocol
Message-ID: <20091201105323.6df50e07@doriath>
In-Reply-To: <20091201113852.GA24383@redhat.com>
References: <1259283550-3597-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>
	<20091201113852.GA24383@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: armbru@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, avi@redhat.com

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:38:52 +0000
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:58:50PM -0200, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >  Hi,
> > 
> >  This series has a number of improvements over v0 and is a serious
> > candidate for inclusion.
> > 
> >  Something I'd like to make clear is that QMP is still unstable:
> > some commands output are being fixed and most of the error handling
> > has not been done yet.
> > 
> >  It might look scary to have an unstable protocol merged, on the other
> > hand several issues will only come to light with real people testing
> > QMP (yeah, I'm not real ;) ).
> 
> FYI, I have a fully functional libvirt tree that implements 
> support for this JSON based monitor protocol I am maintaining
> 
> http://gitorious.org/~berrange/libvirt/staging/commits/qemu-monitor-json
> 
> Aside from the odd bug here & there in QEMU, it is all working
> very well. I think the new JSON protocol is a pretty good
> improvement & we'd like to support is as the default mode of
> operation in libvirt ASAP :-)

 Thanks a lot Daniel.

 I'm already working on the problems you've reported, I expect to
fix most of them in the next days.