From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFpbQ-0008VV-3t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:50:44 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFpbL-0008OQ-AF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:50:43 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43419 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFpbL-0008OK-1z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:50:39 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47545) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFpbK-0004Ro-L3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:50:39 -0500 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB2DobL5018470 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 08:50:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:47:58 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20091202134758.GD18193@redhat.com> References: <186e0bde7077cd3384c2e872c008b0c494e0cdf0.1259754427.git.quintela@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <186e0bde7077cd3384c2e872c008b0c494e0cdf0.1259754427.git.quintela@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 19/41] virtio: use the right types for VirtQueue elements List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juan Quintela Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 01:04:17PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela > --- > hw/virtio.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/virtio.c b/hw/virtio.c > index fd617ff..2b36cad 100644 > --- a/hw/virtio.c > +++ b/hw/virtio.c > @@ -646,8 +646,8 @@ void virtio_save(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f) > qemu_put_sbe32s(f, &vdev->num_pci_queues); > > for (i = 0; i < vdev->num_pci_queues; i++) { > - qemu_put_be32(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.num); > - qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].pa); > + qemu_put_be32s(f, &vdev->vq[i].vring.num); > + qemu_put_be64s(f, &vdev->vq[i].pa); > qemu_put_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx); > if (vdev->type == VIRTIO_PCI && > virtio_pci_msix_present(vdev->binding_opaque)) { > @@ -703,8 +703,8 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f) > qemu_get_sbe32s(f, &vdev->num_pci_queues); > > for (i = 0; i < vdev->num_pci_queues; i++) { > - vdev->vq[i].vring.num = qemu_get_be32(f); > - vdev->vq[i].pa = qemu_get_be64(f); > + qemu_get_be32s(f, &vdev->vq[i].vring.num); > + qemu_get_be64s(f, &vdev->vq[i].pa); > qemu_get_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx); > > if (vdev->type == VIRTIO_PCI && Why are these the right types? I see: static inline void qemu_put_be64s(QEMUFile *f, const uint64_t *pv) { qemu_put_be64(f, *pv); } so passing a pointer to qemu_get_be64s seems exactly equivalent to qemu_put_be64 on value. What am I missing? > -- > 1.6.5.2