From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFqYj-0000xq-U0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:52:02 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFqYd-0000vw-Vt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:52:00 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51950 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFqYd-0000vN-GF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:51:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23482) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFqYc-0001gb-S1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:51:55 -0500 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB2EprM1023052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:51:54 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:49:15 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20091202144915.GD18519@redhat.com> References: <0212bb69ec7e94e572f4f0a7d8718a6131e9ceaa.1259754427.git.quintela@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0212bb69ec7e94e572f4f0a7d8718a6131e9ceaa.1259754427.git.quintela@redhat.com> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 27/41] virtio-net: abstract vlans operations List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juan Quintela Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 01:04:25PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela > --- > hw/virtio-net.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/virtio-net.c b/hw/virtio-net.c > index 97db0d0..cf13e94 100644 > --- a/hw/virtio-net.c > +++ b/hw/virtio-net.c > @@ -63,6 +63,21 @@ typedef struct VirtIONet > * - we could suppress RX interrupt if we were so inclined. > */ > > +static void vlan_add(VirtIONet *n, int vid) > +{ > + n->vlans[vid >> 5] |= (1U << (vid & 0x1f)); > +} > + > +static void vlan_del(VirtIONet *n, int vid) > +{ > + n->vlans[vid >> 5] &= ~(1U << (vid & 0x1f)); > +} > + > +static bool vlan_is_set(VirtIONet *n, int vid) > +{ > + return n->vlans[vid >> 5] & ~(1U << (vid & 0x1f)); This one looks wrong. Did you check this does not break vlans? > +} > + > static void virtio_net_get_config(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t *config) > { > VirtIONet *n = DO_UPCAST(VirtIONet, vdev, vdev); > @@ -306,9 +321,9 @@ static int virtio_net_handle_vlan_table(VirtIONet *n, uint8_t cmd, > return VIRTIO_NET_ERR; > > if (cmd == VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_VLAN_ADD) > - n->vlans[vid >> 5] |= (1U << (vid & 0x1f)); > + vlan_add(n, vid); > else if (cmd == VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_VLAN_DEL) > - n->vlans[vid >> 5] &= ~(1U << (vid & 0x1f)); > + vlan_del(n, vid); > else > return VIRTIO_NET_ERR; > > @@ -471,7 +486,7 @@ static int receive_filter(VirtIONet *n, const uint8_t *buf, int size) > > if (!memcmp(&ptr[12], vlan, sizeof(vlan))) { > int vid = be16_to_cpup((uint16_t *)(ptr + 14)) & 0xfff; > - if (!(n->vlans[vid >> 5] & (1U << (vid & 0x1f)))) > + if (!vlan_is_set(n, vid)) > return 0; > } > > -- > 1.6.5.2