From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFvNJ-0005Zi-G8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:00:33 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NFvNE-0005Ti-I4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:00:32 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45056 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NFvNE-0005TT-Ah for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:00:28 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49031) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NFvND-0006xM-T6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:00:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 18:00:03 -0200 From: Luiz Capitulino Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Staging update (0.12 pending freeze) Message-ID: <20091202180003.200cff4b@doriath> In-Reply-To: <4B16C5EC.4080704@codemonkey.ws> References: <4B1699D3.8010908@codemonkey.ws> <20091202174405.6b14319e@doriath> <4B16C5EC.4080704@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:54:20 -0600 Anthony Liguori wrote: > Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:46:11 -0600 > > Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > > > >> I've got all of the patches I'm considering for 0.12 currently in > >> staging. I'm going to work through and test/commit these in a few > >> chunks over the next few days before freezing the tree. > >> > >> If you have a pending patch that you think should be in 0.12, please > >> check to make sure it's there. If you have a new patch you'd like to > >> consider for 0.12, please indicate that in the subject with a [FOR 0.12] > >> tag as I don't plan on doing another full pull of patches (since testing > >> takes time). > >> > > > > My conversion series is not there: > > > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-11/msg01398.html > > > I'm not sure why they aren't there, but can you rebase that against > staging? Specifically, Jan's block migration info patches introduce new > fields. Sure.