From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NGEgx-0001FU-M0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:38:07 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NGEgs-0001Er-KU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:38:06 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39723 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NGEgs-0001Eo-C5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:38:02 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3471)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1NGEgr-0000S2-HH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:38:02 -0500
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:37:47 -0200
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Staging update (0.12 pending freeze)
Message-ID: <20091203143747.362ed005@doriath>
In-Reply-To: <20091203122345.346adc3f@doriath>
References: <4B1699D3.8010908@codemonkey.ws> <4B16BE74.6030006@siemens.com>
	<4B16C0B3.3090501@codemonkey.ws> <20091203122345.346adc3f@doriath>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: markmc@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, ian.molton@collabora.co.uk, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kraxel@redhat.com

On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 12:23:45 -0200
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:32:03 -0600
> Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
>=20
> > > Both freshly rebased against staging (which doesn't build btw).
> > >  =20
> >=20
> > Nope, and it won't for a while.  Instead of fixing everything, I'm just=
=20
> > focusing on small groups of patches at a time.
>=20
>  Right, but people rebasing against it need to build it to be able
> to fix conflicts and test things.
>=20
>  So, here is a list of problems I had to fix/workaround to have staging
> fully building on x86_64.

 With recent changes the -net one went away and we got a new one:

- virtio-rng:

/home/lcapitulino/src/aliguori-queue/hw/virtio-rng.c: In function =E2=80=98=
virtio_rng_save=E2=80=99:
/home/lcapitulino/src/aliguori-queue/hw/virtio-rng.c:147: error: implicit d=
eclaration of function =E2=80=98virtio_save=E2=80=99
/home/lcapitulino/src/aliguori-queue/hw/virtio-rng.c: In function =E2=80=98=
virtio_rng_load=E2=80=99:
/home/lcapitulino/src/aliguori-queue/hw/virtio-rng.c:157: error: implicit d=
eclaration of function =E2=80=98virtio_load=E2=80=99

 Added Ian to the CC list..

 Hm, this is stupid report being useful to anyone? :)