From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NHhdH-0007Ar-RX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:44:23 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NHhdD-00076z-Bg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:44:23 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50266 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NHhdD-00076s-2C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:44:19 -0500
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:49237)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>)
	id 1NHhdD-00077t-Ep
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:44:19 -0500
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([38.113.113.100])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1NHhdB-0003eZ-L1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:44:17 -0500
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] irq latency and tcg
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:44:14 +0000
References: <fb8d4f70912070530x34cee9a2m190373c39162e048@mail.gmail.com>
	<200912071506.02310.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<fb8d4f70912070939xd8ef0eera7aa687bc6e004dd@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fb8d4f70912070939xd8ef0eera7aa687bc6e004dd@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200912071744.15123.paul@codesourcery.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@googlemail.com>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

> > Using -icount should give you precise interrupt delivery.
> 
> That's what I thought, but as I reported a few days ago, I couldn't
> find a good value for icount when using OBP.
> I tried a few values but keep getting "qemu: fatal: Raised interrupt
> while not in I/O function".

That's almost certainly a bug in the sparc backend.

Paul