From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NHxgB-00008n-S8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:52:28 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NHxg6-0008WO-Ss for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:52:26 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58970 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NHxg5-0008Vt-UE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:52:22 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:63078) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NHxg5-0007uw-9Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:52:21 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:52:06 +0000 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [ANNOUNCE][Call-For-Testing] Release 0.12.0-rc1 of QEMU Message-ID: <20091208105206.GA16596@redhat.com> References: <4B1C3377.1020509@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20091207183432.GW24530@redhat.com> <4B1E2D36.6030800@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B1E2D36.6030800@redhat.com> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Anthony Liguori , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:40:54AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 12/07/09 19:34, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 04:43:03PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> > >>It can be downloaded from Savannah at: > >> > >>http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/qemu/qemu-0.12.0-rc1.tar.gz > >> > >>Please send testing feedback (positive or negative) to qemu-devel and > >>file bugs against the release candidate at: > > > >A couple of hotplug issues with the old monitor > > > > > >It crashes with an assertion failure when hot-plugging without ACPI > >enabled. > >Previously this worked, but that was perhaps just by luck rather than > >design. > > "worked" as in "guest actually sees the new device (without reboot)" or > "worked" as in "qemu didn't abort" ? The latter. The guest does not see it, but it at least does not abort. It is the 'does not abort' behaviour I'm interested in - quite OK with this returning an error to the monitor client when acpi is disabled. Regards, Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|