From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NIiiU-0001bs-BI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:05:59 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NIiiN-0001Xk-0k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:05:55 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38608 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NIiiM-0001XU-7i
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:05:50 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37275)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1NIiiL-0006pc-Pz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 08:05:50 -0500
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:05:40 -0200
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/19] monitor: do_info_cpus(): Use QBool
Message-ID: <20091210110540.774180ea@doriath>
In-Reply-To: <4B20F122.4070204@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <1260376078-8694-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>
	<1260376078-8694-7-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>
	<m3ws0vumzi.fsf@crossbow.pond.sub.org>
	<4B20F122.4070204@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Anthony@gnu.org, Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:01:22 -0600
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > Do we want to specify the base for numbers in the JSON?
> >
> > If yes, why not use decimal everywhere?
> >
> > Aside, if we use hexadecimal in JSON at all, then I'd prefer addresses
> > to be hexadecimal.
> >   
> 
> Hexadecimal is not valid to represent numbers in JSON.

 We can return a string.