From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NJB7u-0006Ef-LU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:26:06 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NJB7p-00068V-Qe
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:26:06 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42969 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NJB7p-00068H-Le
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:26:01 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43267)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ieidus@redhat.com>) id 1NJB7p-0003PT-5h
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:26:01 -0500
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:25:52 +0200
From: Izik Eidus <ieidus@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open
Message-ID: <20091211212552.2c95cbad@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80912111115w24b165efh94acff84fd5b6d24@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1393046876.1549021260539141025.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
	<4B226BFC.1040606@codemonkey.ws>
	<20091211204828.464707cf@redhat.com>
	<4B2297A2.8040102@codemonkey.ws>
	<5d6222a80912111115w24b165efh94acff84fd5b6d24@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Cc: Yaniv Kamay <ykamay@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:15:02 -0200
Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> > But to introduce another protocol where a user has to make a choice
> > to use Spice over VNC, I think we need a really good justification
> > for that. =C2=A0It's really about complexity. =C2=A0A user shouldn't ha=
ve to
> > know about Spice or VNC. They shouldn't have to contemplate the
> > trade-offs of whether their management tool is aware or not. =C2=A0It
> > should Just Work.
> >
> >> I would happy to answer more questions if anyone have
> >>
> >
> > Thanks.
>=20
> Just to make a point clear:
>=20
> AFAIU, there are two parts of qemu spice support. The protocol
> (vnc-like), and the guest device (vga-like). I am right?
>=20
>=20

qemu spice support is built by just 2 parts

qxl pci device - para virtual display device,
vdi interfaces - what allow to qemu to connect into the spice library.