From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NJY0M-0006QS-Ak for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:51:50 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NJY0H-0006Ju-JZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:51:49 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35039 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NJY0H-0006Jg-H9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:51:45 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15410) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NJY0G-0006Fw-8b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:51:45 -0500 Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:51:35 +0200 From: Izik Eidus Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Spice and legacy VGA drivers Message-ID: <20091212215135.366ee14c@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4B23EED2.7080806@codemonkey.ws> References: <4B23B5CC.5070309@codemonkey.ws> <20091212173315.4823f958@redhat.com> <4B23D097.7020603@codemonkey.ws> <20091212193025.743910b7@redhat.com> <4B23D45C.9050008@codemonkey.ws> <20091212194620.726c29df@redhat.com> <4B23EED2.7080806@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:28:18 -0600 Anthony Liguori wrote: > Izik Eidus wrote: > > That specific area in spice will be changed very soon due to new > > requiments that the offscreens will add. > > Windows direct draw allow modifying offscreen (or even primary) > > surfaces using a pointer giving to the user, this mean we can`t know > > what parts of the surface was changed... (In some modes the primary > > screen can be changed without we know about this) > > > > We already thought about few algorithems we might want to add to > > spice to better address this "changed without notifications > > surfaces", But it is still not in a state I can confirm in what > > direction we will go in the end (We still need to test most of the > > cases to know what fit us best) > > > > Okay, I'm interested in hearing more about this as it develops. I > think good support for legacy modes is an important requirement. > > For instance, I very often interact with VMs in text console mode. > In cloud deployments, it's pretty common to have minimal appliances > that don't have a full X session. Sure, this exactly why we still dont sure what kind of algorithem we will use... , we are searching for something that wont deprived any usage (Such as text console mode, or "modified by pointer surface") Thanks. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori >