From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NKEKM-0002SF-Gk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:03:19 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NKEKH-0002R9-Pr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:03:17 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34369 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NKEKG-0002Qd-W5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:03:13 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32247)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <glommer@redhat.com>) id 1NKEKG-00079Y-IF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:03:12 -0500
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:03:04 -0200
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?
Message-ID: <20091214170304.GD3670@mothafucka.localdomain>
References: <4B26090B.8010707@redhat.com> <20091214094406.GB32140@redhat.com>
	<4B261082.4030806@redhat.com> <20091214105912.GA32355@redhat.com>
	<1913984B-EF3F-4974-830A-DF97B8410AA6@suse.de>
	<20091214132423.GB973@redhat.com> <4B263F23.2090601@suse.de>
	<4B2647AF.1030605@codemonkey.ws> <20091214141143.GA1360@redhat.com>
	<4B264A14.1000802@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B264A14.1000802@codemonkey.ws>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 08:22:12AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >Well I am pretty sure that I used virtio + e1000 with 0.11
> >and apparently I can't now.
> >So it does look like a regression to me ...
> 
> That's what I said, we should make sure that we stop loading roms
> when we run out of room as opposed to trampling over the bios space.

Can't we first load the bios?

Then we're pretty sure oproms will never trample it.