From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NKHwB-0002cU-22
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:54:35 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NKHw6-0002a7-8y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:54:34 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39728 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NKHw5-0002a4-Rz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:54:30 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38877)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1NKHw5-0002hx-BP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:54:29 -0500
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:51:41 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qdev property bug?
Message-ID: <20091214205141.GC6398@redhat.com>
References: <4B264AF1.6060802@codemonkey.ws>
	<7FB8DD1225E54176BCAF5523B6AEA89B@FSCPC>
	<4B26931E.4000101@codemonkey.ws> <20091214194210.GB6150@redhat.com>
	<4B269933.3010906@codemonkey.ws> <20091214202019.GF6150@redhat.com>
	<4B26A0DE.5000304@redhat.com> <20091214203428.GI6150@redhat.com>
	<20091214203603.GJ6150@redhat.com> <4B26A3B2.2030006@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B26A3B2.2030006@codemonkey.ws>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: glommer@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@gmx.de>

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 02:44:34PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> Or, we could have a very small ROM, that loads
>> more actual code from card or from qemu directly
>> when it is run.
>>   
>
> It's not as simple as it sounds but it's possible, in theory at least.
>
> But I think the question really is, what problem are we trying to solve?

Support 256 devices on PCI bus seamlessly.

> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori