From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/7] QMP: Update spec file
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:48:05 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091218154805.32b58702@doriath> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B2BBF7B.9070808@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:44:27 -0600
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > While I think these promises are appropriate for a mature version of the
> > protocol, I do not think we should make them for 0.12.
> >
> > We've just dreamed up version 0.1 of the protocol. It hasn't been used
> > in anger. Yes, we put some serious thought in it, and we even have
> > prototype code using it in libvirt, but let's face it, we're not
> > infallible: we *will* have to evolve stuff.
> >
> > Without a real user, there is no real need to constrict evolution of the
> > protocol in such a harsh way. All it'll buy is is compatibility cruft.
> > Passage of time will bring us plenty of cruft without us setting
> > ourselves up for extras.
> >
> > Let's cut ourselves some slack here, please.
> >
>
> I've been working on the release notes and I was intending on announcing
> the QMP support in 0.12 as a "preview" with full support in 0.13.
>
> The idea being that we would try to maintain compatibility but "preview"
> gives us enough slack that if we break it, we can at least claim that it
> was just a preview ;-)
Should I update the spec then?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-18 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-18 15:24 [Qemu-devel] [FOR 0.12 0/7]: More QMP related fixes Luiz Capitulino
2009-12-18 15:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/7] QMP: Only handle converted commands Luiz Capitulino
2009-12-18 15:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] QMP: Return an empty dict by default Luiz Capitulino
2009-12-18 15:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] QMP: Assure that returned data is a QDict Luiz Capitulino
2009-12-21 19:21 ` Nathan Baum
2009-12-22 3:06 ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-12-18 15:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/7] QMP: Update README file Luiz Capitulino
2009-12-18 15:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/7] QMP: Update spec file Luiz Capitulino
2009-12-18 17:20 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-12-18 17:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-12-18 17:48 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2009-12-18 18:06 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-12-18 18:08 ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-12-18 17:55 ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-12-18 18:38 ` Markus Armbruster
2009-12-18 15:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] monitor: Introduce 'M' argument type Luiz Capitulino
2009-12-18 15:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/7] monitor: do_balloon(): Use " Luiz Capitulino
2009-12-18 17:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [FOR 0.12 0/7]: More QMP related fixes Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091218154805.32b58702@doriath \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).