From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NMKJV-0006jl-9U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:51:05 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NMKJQ-0006gt-Bc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:51:04 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42464 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NMKJQ-0006gm-7E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:51:00 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62761) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NMKJP-0001fj-MG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:50:59 -0500 Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:48:12 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20091220114812.GA15588@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [Qemu-devel] stable-0.12 versus master branching? List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori I am really confused wrt stable 0.12 branching policy. For example I see this, in master: commit d587e0787153f0224a6140c5015609963ceaabfb Author: Anthony Liguori Date: Mon Dec 14 11:36:53 2009 -0600 Revert "pci: interrupt disable bit support" This reverts commit 0ea5709a32085f7d14901a09d12bd35f9b267607. Per discussion with Michael Tsirkin, this is too risky for 0.12 Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori (this was cherry-picked in stable-0.12 as well). >>From the comment, this revert makes sense for stable-0.12 but not for master. Is this an attempt to keep stable and master as close as possible? I expected master development to proceed while stable-0.12 would get just bugfixes. No? Thanks, -- MST