From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NMNrz-0007is-4S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:38:55 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NMNru-0007fu-I9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:38:54 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41850 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NMNru-0007fn-B1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:38:50 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15666)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1NMNrt-00007e-Tt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:38:50 -0500
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:38:46 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] cpuid problem in upstream qemu with kvm
Message-ID: <20091220153846.GO4490@redhat.com>
References: <4B2698A9.9090107@codemonkey.ws>
	<20091214200002.GA27769@redhat.com>
	<4B2699BB.1090302@codemonkey.ws> <20091214201049.GD6150@redhat.com>
	<4B269D99.8080404@codemonkey.ws> <4B2DF334.6030208@redhat.com>
	<4B2E3943.9020802@codemonkey.ws> <4B2E3AC5.3040200@redhat.com>
	<4B2E43BA.7030404@codemonkey.ws> <4B2E4499.6010202@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4B2E4499.6010202@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 05:36:57PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/20/2009 05:33 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>- casual (non-management-app-using) users will start seeing
> >>problems with Windows guests unless they change their command
> >>lines
> >
> >
> >Assuming their migrating across different CPU types.
> >
> 
> I was thinking about upgrading their host cpu.  I doubt you'd live
> migrate without a management app.
> 
And what about VM on disk-on-key or VM image on NFS that can be started
from different locations?

--
			Gleb.